Product · Sandboxing

The agent keeps working. Your data never moves

Workflow-aware restrictions on what an agent can — and can't — do. Risky writes land in a copy-on-write sandbox; the original is untouched and the evidence is sealed.

Book a demo
The problem

Blocking breaks the workflow. Allowing breaks the rules

Agents are useful precisely because they act. Hard blocks turn them off and push users to shadow tools; blanket allows hand them your file system. Neither is a policy.

What agents reach for

  • Secrets — .env files, key material, and credential stores sitting in the paths agents traverse by default.
  • Sensitive shares — finance, HR, and legal paths one prompt-injection away from a bulk read.
  • Production code paths — writes that land straight in repos and configs without review.
  • The shell — arbitrary command execution as the logged-in user.

Why native controls fall short

  • Policy files are static — allow/deny lists can't reason about a workflow in flight.
  • Permission prompts train click-through — and some agent modes disable them entirely.
  • EDR doesn't speak agent — the process is signed and trusted; the behavior is the risk.
How it works

Enforcement at the point of action

Write redirect
A risky write is transparently redirected into a copy-on-write clone — the agent completes its task, the original file never changes, and the full diff is sealed as evidence.
Path & secret fences
Keep agents out of .env, /secrets, and production paths with fences that follow the workflow, not just the file tree.
Block process
Unauthorized tools get shut down at the process level — with full context on what they were, and what they tried.
Notify & comply
Alerts with full context land in your stack; employee warnings and risk acceptance keep the paper trail complete.
Contain without breaking. The agent finishes its job, the user never files a ticket, and nothing sensitive moved.

See a sandbox intercept, live

Book a demo. We'll scope a deployment for your environment.

Book a demo